Trad? Not the Elliott 503!

-origin

[extra: colossus_tnmoc.webp|The re-built 1940s Colossus at The National Museum of Computing, Bletchley|280|left]The Elliott 503 was built by British computer company Elliott Brothers, a subsidiary of the Elliott Automation Group, as a much faster but software-compatible evolution of the 803 mentioned in the advert. 

250 "803" machines were built, of which an example still runs at The National Museum of Computing in Bletchley, the home of Colossus.

According to the advert, Elliott built the first British computers to run the computer language ALGOL, which had been implement by well-known computer scientist Tony Hoare on the 803[source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliott_Automation] whilst he was working for the company.

Hoare was perhaps more famous for inventing the quicksort algorithm, but he was also infamous as the inventor of the "null reference", which he called his "billion dollar mistake" in acknowledgement of the problems it caused for generations of software developers that followed[source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Hoare#Apologies_and_retractions].

Elliott eventually merged into a group which also included legendary British companies Marconi, English Electric and Leo - part of J Lyons' restaurants and tearooms empire and which built the world's first business computer in 1951. 

The business-focused part of this group in turn became part of [@ICL] - a 10%-nationalised company formed in 1968 by Harold Wilson's Labour government, whilst the "interesting bits", including the automation parts of Elliott, went to [@GEC][source: email contribution via http://www.tjfroggatt.plus.com/] - the company which would end up briefly running Dragon Data before the the latter's collapse in 1984. 

GEC would eventually end up as part of BAe Systems, whilst ICL was subsumed by [@Fujitsu] in 1998, although it kept its name until 2002[source: http://www.fujitsu.com/global/about/corporate/history/1992-today/].

The Elliott's advertised price of £100,000 was clearly meant to imply that it was some sort of bargain for the time, even though that's a [[now]] equivalent of about [[100000|1962]]. 

However by 1978 the price had come down just a bit so that it was possible to pick up Elliots for no more than £150 - a more modest [[150|1978]] in [[now]], and despite the machines taking up a whole garage-sized room there was still an active user community, with many machines still to be found in schools and colleges[source: "Not so small but just as beautiful", Sheridan Williams, PCW, August 1978, p. 9].

[picture: ELLIOTT4100_praccomp_Jan79.webp|An Elliott 4100 at Bishop Stopford School in Kettering, Northamptonshire. It came free from the Shoe and Allied Trades Research Association but cost the school £200 to ship, plus maintenance could only be done by specialists, and had already cost £175. It was considered too powerful and complex for general school use. From Practical Computing, January 1979, pp. 30-31]

Reading through the technical documents[source: http://www.billp.org/ccs/503/index.html], it looks like this machine had storage roughly analogous to 40kB (8192 5-byte words), with a "cycle time" of 3.5&mu;Secs, which gave it an approximately 280KHz processor - that's about 10,000-times slower than a 2019 Pixel 4 smartphone. 

[picture: ChrisEvans_MM_page56.webp|Dr. Chris Evans, author of The Might Micro, shows how large a human brain made out of computer components would have to be at various eras of the computer industry. From The Mighty Micro: The Impact of the Computer Revolution, Christopher Evans, ISBN 0 575 02708 8, p. 56]

Technical development at the time was focussed much more on miniaturisation, such that a Commodore [#PET], which arrived 15 years later in 1977, was only 4 times faster, still had roughly the same amount of memory but was about 500 times smaller.

[extra: Inmos_Newport_popcw_1982-07-22.webp|Inmos's Newport Plant, designed by Richard Rogers, &copy; POCW, July 1982|320]Tony Hoare cropped up again years later in the early 1980s when he was involved as consultant to David May, the Chief Computer Architect at Inmos.

Inmos was a 1978-founded government-funded British semi-conductor manufacturer, backed by around £100 million from the British Technology Group - formerly known as the National Enterprise Board which had bailed out [@Sinclair] in 1978.

From its Richard Rogers-designed manufacturing plant in Newport, Wales, it had started out by producing memory chips and by 1982 was providing more than 80% of the world market for 16K static RAM.

Despite that, the company still managed to report a £17.3 million loss for 1981 and required much in the way of state aid to keep going, eventually sucking up over £200 million of government money, before it was sold in the Autumn of 1984 without ever becoming profitable[source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inmos#Business_history].

Inmos then moved on to CPUs, with its first product in this market being the T-series Transputer, with models such as the T424 - a fast 32-bit chip with 4K on-board RAM, external memory interface, its own peripheral interface and four high-speed serial links to the outside world. 

Crucially, this serial link meant that it was (relatively) easy to connect a whole raft of Transputers directly together, forming a massively-parallel system.

Such a set-up needed a new progamming language, as those already available - Fortran, COBOL, Pascal, Pascal's precursor ALGOL 60, or even BASIC, which developed from Fortran II - were not suited to multi-tasking or concurrency. 

The language May came up with was called Occam, in reference to the 14th-century English philosopher William of Occam whose famous contribution to culture - Occam's Razor -  was summed up by John Cook in Popular Computing Weekly as "if in doubt, leave it out".

Tipped as a possible "5th generation artificial intelligence language of the future", a version of Occam was also to be found on the 68000-based [#Sage IV][source: "The parallel dimension", Popular Computing Weekly, 18th July 1985, p. 20-21].

