The battle is over: MS-DOS has become the dominant 16-bit operating system

There's nothing like a bit of gloating, and this advert certainly has it in spades, featuring as it does a set of quotes about how Microsoft's MS-DOS had killed off CP/M to become the industry standard. 

It was worse because it was true, but the story of how it came about is tragic: how a quick-and-dirty clone of CP/M purchased from a garage-based company called Seattle Computer Products combined with some opportunistic sales pitching became the operating system for IBM's new machine - the 5150 - and took over the world. 

The author of CP/M - Gary Kildall - whose OS had up to that point been the most popular on serious business machines since the mid 1970s, lost out and his contribution to the history of microcomputers was largely ignored. 

The company he founded - Digital Research - struggled on for a while, servicing a large but legacy niche of older largely Z80 micros, and it even released an operating system called DR-DOS that was said to contain many features thought to be missing in MS-DOS[source: "DR loyal to DOS", PCW, January 1989, p. 98]. 

However, the company never regained the popularity it had with CP/M and was sold in 1991 to Novell.

In early 1984, Microsoft announced that it had licenced MS-DOS to 100 companies, so on one level the advert's claim that it had "won" was somewhat premature as Digital Research at that time still had 300 companies as licensees[source: "Random news bits", PCW, March 1984, p. 230]. 

However, in terms of scale, Microsoft had the advantage that it had the dominant IBM PC platform more-or-less sewn up - by the end of 1983 it was estimated that some 1 million IBMs or clones had already been manufactured[source: "IBM news", PCW, March 1984, p. 229]. 

It was the same with revenues, where it did seem that MS had beaten Digital Research with a report issued by Future Computing showing that MS was "the largest independent personal computer software publisher" in 1983, with revenues of $68 million (around [[45|1983]] million in [[now]]). 

This was about the same as Apple, but behind IBM which was shifting $110 million, whilst DR was down in seventh place with software revenues of $46 million[source: "Software report", PCW, March 1984, p. 230].

Not everything was a success for Microsoft though. 

Its MSX operating system, aimed at MSX home computers and designed to provide a reliable, compatible platform for a whole range of microcomputers from different manufacturers, had not been received well, partly as it relied on ROM cartridge software but largely because it was already out of date by the time it had been specified. 

DR's antidote was a disk-based version of CP/M called "Personal CP/M", launched specifically to target the home computer market. 

MS retaliated by announcing MSX-DOS in early 1984. This was also disk-based, and could also run CP/M-80 software[source: "Microsoft's MSX-DOS", PCW, March 1984, p. 230]. 

DR, meanwhile, announced a new improved version of CP/M-86 which provided some window-like behaviour and was able to run MS-DOS and PC-DOS (the IBM variant) software[source: "CP/M-86 verision 3.1", PCW, March 1984, p. 230]. 

Tit for tat certainly, but also endlessly confusing for consumers.

By the late summer of 1984, CP/M was already being considered as obsolete, but somehwat worryingly for Microsoft there were also suggestions during 1984's National Computer Conference - held in Las Vegas in July - that MS-DOS could soon follow it into oblivion. 

This was partly because MS-DOS wasn't especially friendly, and according to the New York publisher of the Release 1.0 newsletter, IBM - and by extension Microsoft - didn't "appreciate the advantages of a non-intimidating user interface or the importance of integrating graphics within text".

It was also because Unix was starting to make inroads into the mainstream, and as IBM's president John F. Akers frequently said:

~"if a particular operating system appears to have the support of most of the marketplace, then we would seriously consider offering the product to our customers"

Esther Dyson, president of EDventures, was on the money though when she pointed out that, thanks to Microsoft retaining rights to MS-DOS, its own version of the PC-DOS that it sold to IBM:

~"IBM thinks it owns PC-DOS, but it doesn't. There's going to be a huge market out there for PC-DOS hardware and software, no matter what IBM does[source: PC News, PC Magazine, September 4th 1984, p. 34. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vQDibG12bVcC&pg=PA34&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false]".


